Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Urine Catheterization Performed Without Physician Order

Selma, California Survey Completed on 08-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) attempted to obtain a urine specimen from a resident by performing a straight catheterization without a physician's order. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a history of hemiplegia, metabolic encephalopathy, and malignant neoplasm of the brain, recalled being confused and nervous during the procedure, as she had previously been able to provide urine specimens using a hat. The LVN made two unsuccessful attempts to insert the catheter before ultimately collecting the specimen via bedpan, without notifying the physician or the resident's responsible party. The LVN stated she was unaware that a physician's order was required for this procedure, as it had been standard practice at her previous place of employment for incontinent residents. Facility policy and procedure documents reviewed indicated that a physician's order is required for invasive procedures such as straight catheterization and for obtaining urine specimens. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the LVN had attempted the procedure without an order and acknowledged that straight catheterization is considered invasive. The facility's administrator also acknowledged that the LVN's actions were not in line with facility expectations, which require staff to follow physician orders, adhere to policy, and document all interactions and communications.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙