Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Timely Notify LTC Ombudsman of Resident Discharge

Temecula, California Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a copy of the discharge notice for a resident was sent to the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman at the same time it was provided to the resident and their representative. According to interviews and record review, the discharge notice was given to the resident and their family member on April 22, 2025, but was not sent to the LTC Ombudsman until April 25, 2025. Facility policy requires that the notice be sent to the Ombudsman simultaneously with the notice to the resident and representative. The resident involved was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, and was being discharged because their health had improved sufficiently to no longer require services from the facility. Documentation confirmed the discharge process and the timing of notifications, as well as the facility's policy on transfer or discharge notices. The delay in notifying the LTC Ombudsman was confirmed through staff interviews and review of the discharge notice and progress notes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙