Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Timely Respond to Call Lights for Two Residents

Bakersfield, California Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for two residents, resulting in delays in addressing their needs. One resident, who had diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, muscle weakness, and incontinence, reported that night staff did not answer the call light and that it took hours for his request to be addressed, specifically when he needed his brief changed. This resident was cognitively intact and expressed feeling ridiculed and helpless due to the delay. His care plan indicated a need for assistance with activities of daily living and incontinence care due to his medical conditions. Another resident, also cognitively intact, reported that it took approximately 45 minutes at night for staff to respond to her call light when she requested water. The Director of Nursing confirmed that waiting 45 minutes to an hour for call light response was not acceptable, especially when residents required assistance with changing briefs or obtaining water. The facility's policy required nursing staff to answer call bells promptly and return to residents with requested items or responses in a timely manner.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙