Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0605
D

Failure to Identify and Respond to EPS in Resident on Antipsychotic Medication

Riverside, California Survey Completed on 06-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to identify and respond to adverse effects of psychotropic medication in one resident who was administered Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication. The resident, who had diagnoses including schizophrenia and depression, was observed on two separate occasions exhibiting a facial chewing motion while in the dining room. Despite these visible symptoms, the resident's medical record indicated that EPS (extrapyramidal symptoms) monitoring was documented as negative for all shifts during the same period, and an AIMS assessment earlier in the month also reported no abnormal involuntary movements. Interviews with the assigned CNA and LVN confirmed that both observed the facial chewing motion but were unaware that it was a sign of EPS. The DON also observed the symptom and identified it as EPS, stating that nursing staff should have been able to assess these signs and symptoms. The facility's policy required documentation of adverse reactions and monitoring for psychotropic drug complications, but this was not effectively implemented for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙