Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Collaborate with Hospice in Timely Care Plan Development

San Francisco, California Survey Completed on 07-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan within 7 days after the completion of a comprehensive assessment for a resident receiving hospice services. Specifically, there was no documented participation or collaboration with the hospice interdisciplinary team (IDT) in revising or updating the resident's care plan, despite the resident being admitted with a primary diagnosis of vascular dementia and being placed on hospice care. The care plan did not reflect input from the hospice provider, and there were no hospice progress notes present in the resident's chart. Interviews with facility staff revealed that after being informed by a PACE agency physician that the resident would be on hospice, a significant change assessment was completed, and the resident's family was notified. However, the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no IDT meeting or documented collaboration with the hospice agency in the care planning process. The facility's own policy requires a coordinated plan of care between the facility, hospice agency, and resident/family, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙