Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Assess and Provide for Resident's Food Preferences During Nutritional Assessment

Glendale, California Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with chronic pulmonary edema and acute respiratory failure, who was cognitively intact and able to make decisions, was admitted to the facility. Upon review of the resident's records, it was found that neither the admission nor the comprehensive nutritional assessments included documentation of the resident's food preferences. The resident reported that no one had asked about their food preferences and expressed dissatisfaction with the food, specifically noting a desire for more meat, fresh vegetables, and less salty or overcooked food. Observations of meal trays confirmed that the food served was salty, mushy, and unappealing. Further review of the resident's records showed a significant weight loss of 7.54 lbs over approximately one month, with meal intake averaging only 25-50%. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Dietary Supervisor confirmed that the resident's food preferences were not assessed or incorporated into the care plan, and no measures were developed to address the resident's nutritional needs or prevent further weight loss. The facility's policy required that food preferences and dislikes be identified as part of the nutritional assessment, but this was not done for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙