Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Update Person-Centered Care Plan for Resident Activities

Escondido, California Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan that addressed all of a resident's needs, specifically neglecting to include the resident's preferred activities. The resident, who had a history of major depressive disorder and moderate cognitive deficits, expressed a desire to participate in social activities such as bingo and coffee gatherings but required assistance to get out of bed and to change into her own clothing. Despite these expressed preferences and needs, the care plan had not been updated since the previous year and did not reflect the resident's current activity interests or participation frequency as indicated in her activity participation review. Interviews with the Activities Director (AD) revealed a lack of awareness regarding the need to update activity care plans following quarterly and comprehensive reassessments. The AD acknowledged the importance of updating care plans to support residents' mental and physical well-being but had not done so for this resident. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that activity preferences should be established through resident interviews and incorporated into individualized care plans, and that the AD should contribute to these updates as part of the interdisciplinary team. The facility's policy also required resident participation in care planning, including determining the type, amount, frequency, and duration of care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙