Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Provide and Document Advance Directive Information

Costa Mesa, California Survey Completed on 08-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide written information and assistance regarding the formulation of advance directives to several residents, as required by its own policies and federal regulations. Specifically, five out of sixteen sampled residents did not receive the necessary written information or documentation about their rights to formulate an advance directive. For two residents, there was no evidence that written information or assistance was provided, and for two others, there was no documentation that the information was offered or discussed. In one case, the facility did not provide written information to a resident's representative when the resident lacked capacity. Medical record reviews revealed that documentation was missing or incomplete for these residents. For example, some residents' records did not include the Advance Directive Acknowledgment form, and progress notes failed to show that the formulation of an advance directive was offered or discussed. In cases where residents were unable to make decisions, there was no evidence that their legal representatives were provided with the required information. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and DON confirmed these documentation gaps and acknowledged that the process for following up on advance directives was inconsistent, especially after staff changes. The affected residents included individuals with varying cognitive abilities, including those with moderate cognitive impairment, those who were cognitively intact, and those who lacked capacity due to medical conditions such as anoxic brain injury or persistent vegetative state. Despite these differences, the facility did not consistently provide or document the provision of written information about advance directives, as required by policy and regulation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙