Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Assess Ongoing Need for Indwelling Urinary Catheter

Costa Mesa, California Survey Completed on 08-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to assess the appropriateness and continued use of an indwelling urinary Foley catheter for a resident who was cognitively intact and had a history of urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Medical record review showed a physician's order for the catheter but did not indicate the reason for its continued use. There was no documentation in the resident's medical record to show that the facility had assessed whether the catheter was still necessary or had attempted to remove it to determine if the resident could urinate independently. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the diagnosis of urinary retention alone was not an adequate indication for ongoing catheter use and that there was no evidence of reassessment or attempts at catheter removal. The resident reported not recalling how long the catheter had been in place and stated that the facility had not tried to remove it. The DON acknowledged these findings during the investigation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙