Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Ensure Proper Authorization and Monitoring of Physical Restraint

Costa Mesa, California Survey Completed on 06-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from the use of physical restraints, as required by policy and regulation. A resident with a history of CVA and left-sided hemiparesis was observed multiple times with a soft mitten restraint on the right hand. There was no active physician's order, updated informed consent, or current care plan authorizing the use of the restraint. The resident's medical record indicated that previous orders and consents for the mitten restraint had been discontinued years prior, and the care plan addressing the restraint had been resolved. Additionally, the resident's medication administration record did not show any current monitoring for the use of the restraint. Staff interviews confirmed that the soft mitten was being used without the necessary documentation, assessment, or monitoring. Both LVN and RN staff acknowledged that the facility's policy required a physician's order, family consent, care plan, and regular monitoring for restraints, none of which were in place for this resident. The administrator also acknowledged these findings. The lack of appropriate assessment, documentation, and monitoring for the use of the restraint constituted a failure to provide an environment free from unnecessary physical restraints.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙