Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
E

Failure to Provide Advance Directive Information and Follow-Up

Beaumont, California Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that seven out of fourteen residents reviewed for Advance Directives (ADs) were provided with follow-up information regarding the formulation of an AD. Multiple residents, including those with the capacity to make decisions and those with fluctuating or no capacity, were either unsure if they had an AD or could not recall being offered information about one. Record reviews for these residents consistently showed either no documentation of an AD or no evidence that information or education about ADs was provided to the resident or their representative. Interviews with the Social Service Director (SSD) revealed that the facility's protocol was to determine the presence of an AD upon admission and to offer resources if one was not present. However, the SSD acknowledged that follow-up with residents or their representatives was not consistently performed, and documentation of such follow-up was lacking. In several cases, the SSD admitted that education and resources regarding ADs were not provided as required, and that quarterly reviews or care conferences did not include documented follow-up on ADs for residents without one. The facility's own policy required that residents be asked about ADs upon admission and that assistance be offered if an AD was not in place, with this information to be prominently displayed in the medical record. Despite this, the survey found that for the seven residents in question, there was no documented evidence that they or their representatives were provided with the necessary information or education about their right to formulate an AD, as required by facility policy and federal regulations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙