Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision for High-Risk Elopement Resident

Compton, California Survey Completed on 05-17-2025

Penalty

Fine: $45,920
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for a resident identified as high risk for elopement. The resident, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder, was assessed as having moderate cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living. The resident had a documented history of elopement attempts and had verbally expressed a desire to leave the facility. Despite these risk factors, the resident was able to remove her wander guard bracelet, which she found uncomfortable, and refused to have it reapplied. The care plan was updated to indicate frequent visual checks, but did not specify the frequency or documentation requirements for these checks. On the day of the incident, the resident was able to leave the facility without staff knowledge by using a chair to exit through a window. She spent the day shopping and returned to the facility without injury, only informing her sister of her whereabouts. Interviews with staff revealed that the care plan's instructions for frequent visual checks were unclear, lacking specific intervals and documentation protocols. Both the LVN and DON acknowledged that the care plan should have been more precise to ensure the resident's safety and adequate supervision. A review of facility policies indicated that individualized care plans should include measurable objectives and timetables, and that resident safety and supervision are facility-wide priorities. However, the lack of specificity in the resident's care plan and the absence of clear monitoring procedures contributed to the failure to prevent the resident's elopement.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙