Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans

Mission Hills, California Survey Completed on 07-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for four out of five sampled residents, as required by their own policies and regulatory standards. For one resident with a diagnosis of pneumonia, there was no care plan created to address the infection, despite physician orders for antibiotic treatment and documentation of severely impaired cognitive skills. Both the Infection Preventionist and nursing leadership confirmed that a care plan should have been developed to guide nursing care and ensure continuity. Another resident, who was prescribed azithromycin for bronchitis, also did not have a care plan addressing the use of this antibiotic. The resident had a history of Parkinson’s disease, dementia, and fluctuating decision-making capacity. Nursing leadership acknowledged that the absence of a care plan for antibiotic use could result in a lack of guidance for staff and potentially impact the resident’s care. A third resident, identified as high risk for falls and with a history of Alzheimer’s disease and osteoporosis, refused to remove a wheelchair from atop a floor mat designed to prevent injury from falls. Although staff were aware of the risks and the resident’s refusal, there was no care plan documenting this behavior or interventions to address it. Additionally, for a fourth resident involved in a resident-to-resident altercation, the care plan addressing the incident was not developed until the day after the event, rather than immediately. Staff interviews confirmed that timely care planning was not performed, which could have delayed appropriate interventions and communication among the care team.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙