Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
J

Failure to Prevent Elopement of High-Risk Residents Due to Inadequate Supervision and Lapses in Security Procedures

Artesia, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Two residents, both assessed as high risk for elopement due to cognitive impairments such as dementia and schizophrenia, were able to leave the facility unsupervised and without staff awareness. Both residents had documented care plans indicating their risk for wandering and required supervision, including monitoring their location every two hours and implementing diversional interventions. Despite these documented needs, staff failed to adequately monitor the residents' whereabouts, and their absence went unnoticed for an extended period. On the day of the incident, a staff member (CNA) observed two women near a locked door leading to the facility's lobby and, believing them to be visitors, signaled for the receptionist to unlock the door. The receptionist, unfamiliar with the residents and not recognizing them as such, allowed them to enter the lobby and subsequently exit through the facility's front entrance. There was no process in place to verify the identity of individuals leaving the facility, and the receptionist did not check for visitor badges or confirm their status before permitting exit. Other staff members later noticed the residents' lunch trays were untouched but did not immediately investigate their whereabouts, assuming they were elsewhere in the facility. The residents were missing for approximately 27 hours before being located by a family member about 20 miles from the facility. Both were subsequently transported to a hospital for evaluation and treatment, with one admitted for altered mental status and the other for a urinary tract infection. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of familiarity with residents, absence of a visitor check-out process, and failure to follow care plan interventions for monitoring high-risk residents, all of which contributed to the residents' unsupervised exit and delayed discovery.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙