Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Multiple Residents

Reedley, California Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the health and functional status of three residents. For one resident, the MDS assessment did not document a history of fall and surgery, despite the resident being admitted with a hip fracture following a fall and subsequent surgery. The MDS nurse acknowledged that the fall and surgery were not coded in the assessment, and both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator confirmed that their expectation was for MDS assessments to be completed accurately, with staff responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the information. Another resident's quarterly MDS assessment inaccurately indicated the use of restraints and alarms, although observations and staff interviews confirmed that the resident did not use any restraints or alarms. The MDS nurse and other staff members recognized this as an error, and the DON emphasized the importance of accurate documentation, as it reflects the resident's condition and ensures appropriate care is provided. The facility's job description for the MDS Coordinator and professional references reviewed also highlighted the requirement for assessments to accurately reflect the resident's status in accordance with state and federal guidelines. A third resident's MDS assessment failed to document the use of a bed sensor alarm, even though the alarm was observed in use and was included in the resident's care plan and provider's orders. The MDS nurse confirmed that the assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's current care needs and acknowledged the responsibility to review care plans and provider orders during assessments. The DON reiterated the expectation that the MDS should reflect the resident's current care needs and that assessments should be conducted in a timely and accurate manner.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙