Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Address and Communicate Significant Resident Weight Loss

Cherry Valley, California Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that adequate nutritional care and services were provided to a resident with a history of diabetes mellitus and muscle wasting. The resident experienced significant weight loss over a short period, losing 4 pounds in one week and an additional 5 pounds in the following weeks. Although the Registered Dietitian (RD) had previously recommended a fortified diet and the physician had agreed to the change, there was no documentation or evidence that the resident's continued weight loss in May was addressed. The care plans included monitoring for weight loss and malnutrition, but there was no indication in the progress, dietary, or nutritional notes that the ongoing weight loss was discussed or acted upon after the initial intervention. Interviews with facility staff revealed a breakdown in communication and monitoring. The RD, Director of Nursing (DON), and Dietary Supervisor (DS) were not made aware of the resident's continued weight loss in May, despite facility policies requiring notification and intervention for significant changes in condition. The DON acknowledged that a change of condition should have been reported and that the nursing staff failed to communicate the weight loss to the appropriate team members. Facility policies emphasized the importance of multidisciplinary monitoring and timely intervention for undesirable weight loss, but these procedures were not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙