Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0697
E

Failure to Provide Safe and Appropriate Pain Management

Lancaster, California Survey Completed on 08-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice and the residents' goals and preferences for multiple residents. For one resident with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver, ankylosing spondylitis, diverticulitis, generalized abdominal pain, and osteoarthritis, the facility did not ensure that licensed nurses assessed and documented the resident's pain level using a numeric pain rating scale, the location of pain, or the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering oxycodone as ordered. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and progress notes revealed numerous instances where these required assessments and interventions were not documented, despite facility policy and physician orders mandating such documentation. The resident reported ongoing abdominal pain and dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of the pain medication provided. Another resident with a history of spinal fusion, rheumatoid arthritis, and pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices was not administered PRN oxycodone 10 mg according to the physician's orders, which specified its use for severe pain (pain scale 7-10). Instead, the medication was given for pain levels below the threshold indicated in the order. Additionally, there was a discrepancy in the orders for oxycodone 5 mg, which was also prescribed for pain levels 7-10, a range typically associated with severe rather than moderate pain. This order was not clarified with the physician prior to administration, and the medication was given for pain levels that did not match the intended severity, as documented in the MAR. A third resident with new onset bilateral shoulder pain did not receive a timely assessment of the pain or administration of a lidocaine patch as ordered. The facility's policies and procedures, which require consistent pain assessment, documentation, and implementation of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, were not followed. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that these lapses in documentation and order clarification occurred, and that the facility's pain management protocols were not adhered to during the period reviewed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙