Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
B

Failure to Revise Care Plans for Individual Resident Needs

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise and update comprehensive care plans to address the individual care needs of two residents. For one resident, the care plan included interventions for fragile skin that required monitoring the effectiveness of zinc oxide cream treatment. However, medical record reviews and staff interviews revealed that the effectiveness of the treatment was not being evaluated or documented, despite the care plan's directive. Staff, including LVNs and the DON, confirmed that maintenance treatments were not evaluated for effectiveness, and the care plan intervention to monitor effectiveness was not being followed or considered necessary. For another resident, the care plan included an intervention to encourage verbalization of feelings, despite documentation and staff interviews indicating the resident had no capacity to understand or make decisions and was rarely or never understood. The resident was unable to verbalize needs, and staff acknowledged that the intervention was not realistic or appropriate for the resident's current cognitive status. The care plan had not been updated to reflect these changes, and the intervention remained inaccurate.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙