Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop Comprehensive, Individualized Care Plans for Two Residents

Anaheim, California Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, individualized care plans for two residents, as required by their own policies and regulatory standards. For one resident, the care plan addressing mood and behavioral symptoms did not include all interventions listed in the resident's Informed Consent Renewal for psychoactive medications. Specifically, non-pharmacological interventions such as encouraging exercise, empathetic listening, individualization of care choices, positive reinforcement, repositioning, and social service or activity visits were documented in the consent form but were not reflected in the resident's care plan. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the MDS Coordinator, confirmed that these interventions were practiced but not formally included in the care plan documentation. For another resident, the facility did not develop a care plan that addressed the recommendations from a PASARR Level II evaluation. The PASARR Level II evaluation, conducted by a psychologist, outlined several personalized care recommendations, including ongoing psychotropic medication monitoring and education, mental health rehabilitation activities, ADL training, supportive services, psychotherapy or counseling, psychiatry consultation, and neuropsychology consultation. Despite these recommendations and the resident's medical history of anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder, the care plan did not reflect these individualized interventions. Facility staff, including the MDS Coordinator, Administrator, and DON, verified during interviews and record reviews that the care plans for both residents were incomplete and did not incorporate all required interventions. These omissions were identified through observation, interviews, medical record reviews, and review of facility policies and procedures.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙