Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0675
D

Failure to Respond Timely to Resident Call System

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 07-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two of four sampled residents received care in accordance with professional standards by not answering the resident call system in a timely manner. One resident, who was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living due to chronic respiratory failure, mobility issues, and generalized anxiety disorder, reported that call lights sometimes went unanswered for half an hour or more, leading to feelings of unsafety, frustration, and anxiety. Direct observation confirmed a delay of seven minutes in responding to this resident's call light. Staff interviews acknowledged that call lights should be answered immediately, but the assigned CNA was unaware of the call due to assisting other residents at the time. Another resident, with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, COPD, and chronic kidney disease, also required significant assistance and reported that call lights often took a couple of hours to be answered. This resident stated that staff frequently cited short staffing as the reason for delays and expressed feelings of neglect. The facility's policies require prompt response to call systems and provision of care based on comprehensive assessments, but these standards were not met, as evidenced by resident reports, staff interviews, and direct observation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙