Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Discharge Coding for Resident

City Of Industry, California Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accurate coding of a resident's discharge destination in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Specifically, a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus was discharged home per their request after dialysis treatment. However, the MDS assessment incorrectly documented the discharge destination as a short-term general hospital. This error was identified during a review of the resident's admission record, physician's order, and discharge summary, all of which confirmed the resident was discharged home. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident was not discharged to a hospital, and both acknowledged the necessity for accurate MDS coding. The facility's policy and procedure on the MDS and Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process indicated that all members of the Interdisciplinary Team share responsibility for the accurate completion of the RAI, with the RN MDS Coordinator responsible for reviewing and signing off on the assessment. Despite these procedures, the MDS was not coded accurately, resulting in incorrect information being reported to CMS.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙