Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
E

Failure to Ensure Call Lights Were Accessible and Functional

City Of Industry, California Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach and functioning properly for two residents, resulting in the potential for delayed or unmet care needs. For one resident with hemiplegia, impaired vision, and severe cognitive impairment, the call light was observed to be placed on a rolling table approximately three feet away from the bed, making it inaccessible. Both the LVN and ADON confirmed that the call light was not within reach and should have been placed closer to the resident's functional side to allow for timely assistance, as outlined in the resident's care plan. Another resident, assessed as high risk for falls due to impaired mobility and vision, reported that their call light had not been working for two days despite notifying staff. The resident stated that no staff responded to the call light and had to leave the room to seek assistance. The facility's policy required staff to ensure call lights were functional and to answer them promptly, but this was not followed, as evidenced by the resident's experience and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙