Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food Preferences

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 08-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus was admitted to the facility and required a therapeutic diet, specifically a renal 80-gram protein, regular texture, thin liquids, controlled carbohydrate, double portion protein diet. The resident's dietary preferences, documented during the admission process, included a request for wheat bread instead of white bread and no cheese. Despite these documented preferences, the resident was repeatedly served white bread and pasta, contrary to their requests. The resident expressed frustration and concern about the lack of accommodation for their food preferences, stating that dietary staff were not honoring their requests. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed that the last dietary preference assessment reflected the resident's requests and acknowledged a mistake in serving white bread. The supervisor explained that tray line staff were responsible for checking menu cards with meal trays and recognized the importance of honoring resident food preferences. Facility policy indicated that reasonable efforts would be made to accommodate resident choices and preferences, but this was not followed in this instance, resulting in the resident not receiving meals consistent with their documented preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙