Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
E

Failure to Provide and Document Follow-Up on Advance Directives

Riverside, California Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents' rights regarding advance directives (ADs) were fully honored and documented for five of seven residents reviewed. Multiple residents, including those with intact or moderate cognitive function, expressed uncertainty about whether they had an AD or requested more information about formulating one. Despite this, there was no documented evidence that these residents or their resident representatives (RPs) were provided with follow-up information or education about their right to formulate an AD after admission. Record reviews for each resident showed that, upon admission, residents were provided with an acknowledgment form regarding ADs, and if they did not have an AD, they were to be given a handout and education on how to create one. The facility's policy also required quarterly follow-up during care conferences for residents without an AD. However, for all five residents cited, there was no documentation that such follow-up or education occurred during the relevant care conferences, even when residents indicated a desire for more information or were unsure about their AD status. Interviews with the Social Services Director (SSD) confirmed that the expected process was not consistently documented or followed. The SSD acknowledged that if there was no AD on file, there was a potential for the facility to be unable to honor residents' wishes for care. The lack of documentation and follow-up regarding ADs was observed across multiple residents with varying medical conditions, including stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hypertensive heart disease, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, and malnutrition.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙