Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility and Timely Response

Hemet, California Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of two residents by not ensuring proper placement and timely response to call lights. For one resident with right-sided weakness due to a cerebral infarction, the call light was placed on the right side of the bed, making it inaccessible to her. This resident expressed being cold and unable to reach the call light to request assistance. Both a CNA and the Director of Staff Development confirmed that the call light should have been placed on the left side, as documented in the resident's care plan, to allow her to call for help. Another resident, also with a history of cerebral infarction, reported that staff took 30 minutes or longer to answer her call lights. During observation, another resident was heard calling for help, and their call light remained on for about 17 minutes before a CNA responded. Staff interviews and facility policy indicated that call lights should be answered within seven to fifteen minutes, and that all staff are responsible for responding promptly. The care plans for both residents emphasized the need for timely assistance and the use of call lights, but these procedures were not followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙