Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
D

Failure to Provide Palatable and Preferred Meals

Pasadena, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide palatable and attractive food in accordance with its own policies for one resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including morbid obesity, GERD, and major depressive disorder, was cognitively intact and able to express his preferences and needs. Documentation and interviews revealed that the resident frequently received meals that were unappetizing, with food described as dry, mushy, and visually unappealing. The resident repeatedly voiced dissatisfaction with the taste and texture of the food, specifically noting that vegetables were overcooked and meats were excessively dry, leading him to avoid eating the meals provided. Despite the resident's clear communication of his food preferences and repeated requests for alternatives, the facility did not consistently accommodate these needs. Dietary staff acknowledged the resident's particular preferences and his tendency to refuse food that did not meet his standards, yet the issues persisted. Facility policy required that individual food preferences be accommodated within reason, but observations and interviews confirmed that the resident continued to receive meals he found unacceptable, negatively impacting his willingness to eat and his psychosocial well-being.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙