F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
D

Failure to Initiate Significant Change Assessment After Resident's Behavioral Decline

Shoreline Care CenterOxnard, California Survey Completed on 07-01-2025

Summary

The facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed to initiate a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) for a resident who experienced a major decline in mental and behavioral health. The resident, admitted with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia, psychosis, depression, and chronic pain, began refusing critical psychiatric medications such as aripiprazole and sertraline. This refusal persisted over several days, during which the resident exhibited escalating symptoms of psychosis, including delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, and severe behavioral disturbances. Despite these significant changes, there was no evidence in the clinical record of an IDT review or a determination to initiate an SCSA during this period. The resident's behavior became increasingly aggressive and erratic, with documented incidents of physical and verbal aggression towards other residents and staff, refusal to comply with facility rules, and multiple altercations. The resident was involved in several incidents, including slapping another resident, threatening staff, and starting fires within the facility. The crisis team and police were called multiple times, but no effective clinical interventions or comprehensive assessments were implemented by the facility. The resident's actions resulted in harm to other residents, such as bruising, and placed both residents and staff at risk. Throughout the period of behavioral escalation, the facility's records showed no evidence of an SCSA or other required assessments being completed after the resident's admission. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and MDS RN, confirmed that no additional assessments were performed despite the resident's significant changes in condition. The facility's own policy required the IDT to assess and determine the cause of behavioral symptoms through the MDS/CAA process or team evaluation, but this was not documented or carried out in response to the resident's decline.

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Resources

Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:

See other F0637 citations
Failure to Complete Significant Change MDS Assessment
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

Failure to Complete Significant Change MDS Assessment: A resident with dementia, progressive neurological conditions, and seizure disorder had an admission MDS that coded no mobility device use and independence with ADLs, but later was observed ambulating with a walker and gait belt. Quarterly MDSs still did not code walker use and showed increased ADL assistance needs, yet no comprehensive or significant change MDS had been completed. MDS coordinators said they were unaware of the walker use, believed the resident likely should not have been coded as independent, and confirmed the significant change MDS was missed.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Delayed Significant Change MDS Completion
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

The facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS within the required timeframe for a resident with diabetes and COPD who was admitted to hospice. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the assessment was completed after the 14-day deadline.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Late MDS SCSA After Hospice Election
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

The facility failed to complete an MDS SCSA within the required timeframe after a resident elected hospice. The resident’s hospice services began and the SCSA was completed late, and the MDS Coordinator acknowledged the assessment was probably completed after the 14-day window. CMS RAI guidance requires a SCSA when a terminally ill resident enrolls in hospice and remains in the facility.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Complete Significant Change Assessments After Fractures
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

The facility failed to complete SCSA MDS assessments within 14 days for two residents after fractures were identified. One resident with dementia, osteoporosis, AFib, HTN, and depression had a right fibular fracture after a foot/ankle injury, and another resident with dementia, TIA history, stroke history, hypothyroidism, and bilateral above-the-knee amputations had a left elbow fracture. The DON could not provide a policy or documentation for when and how a significant change assessment is completed, and the DON and an LPN confirmed the assessments were not done.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Delayed Significant Change Assessment for Hospice Election
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

Delayed Significant Change Assessment for Hospice Election: A resident with cancer elected hospice, but the facility did not complete the SCSA within the required 14-calendar-day timeframe. The MDSC stated she did not know the assessment had to be completed within 14 days, and the DON believed they had 2 weeks to complete a significant change for hospice. The facility policy listed the MDS completion date as the 14th calendar day after determination of significant change in status.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Complete Timely Significant Change Assessment
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

Failure to complete timely significant change assessment: A resident with Alzheimer's disease, stroke, DM2, dysphagia, depression, heart disease, and dementia with agitation had a 5.15% weight loss in one week and developed a stage III pressure ulcer on the bilateral buttocks after an MDS showed no significant weight change and no unhealed pressure ulcers. The ADON stated she was unaware of any IDT discussions about whether a Significant Change MDS should have been completed before hospice was initiated.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation search

Search every citation & Plan of Correction

Go to search
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across California

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in California — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

Trusted data from CMS and state health departments

Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.

In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.

The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.

Get the Survey-Prep Report
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Connection lost — reconnecting… We couldn't reconnect automatically. Please reload the page to continue.