Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Document Advance Directive Discussions for Two Residents

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the medical records of two sampled residents were updated to show documented evidence that advance directives (AD) were discussed, as required by policy and regulation. For one resident, the admission record indicated multiple diagnoses including psychosis, dementia, and muscle wasting, with conflicting assessments of cognitive capacity. The Advance Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement Form for this resident was incomplete, lacking documentation of whether the resident or their representative was provided information about formulating an AD or if they refused such information. Interviews with the LVN, Social Services Director (SSD), and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the form was not properly completed and that the resident’s or representative’s right to be informed and assisted in formulating an AD was not honored. A second resident, admitted with significant cardiac and neurological diagnoses, also had an incomplete Advance Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement Form. The form did not indicate whether the resident or their representative was provided information on advance directives or whether an advance directive had been formulated prior to admission. Staff interviews confirmed that the required documentation was missing, and the SSD acknowledged that the resident’s right to formulate an advance directive was not ensured due to the lack of proper documentation and follow-through. Facility policy required that, at the time of admission, staff inquire about the execution of an advance directive and document any discussion regarding advance directives in the resident’s record, even if the resident chose not to execute one. Both the Basic Record Review and Resident Rights-Quality of Life policies emphasized the importance of documentation and person-centered care. The failure to complete and document the Advance Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement Forms for these residents resulted in a violation of their rights to be fully informed and to participate in decisions regarding their care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙