Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Communicate with Residents in Preferred Language

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents were communicated with in their preferred language, as required by their care needs and facility policy. Both residents were cognitively intact and had documented language preferences other than English in their Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Despite this, interviews revealed that one resident experienced ongoing difficulty communicating with medication nurses, and no alternative communication methods or interpretation services were offered to assist him in understanding his care. The other resident also had a language preference documented but there was no evidence that this need was accommodated. The Director of Nursing acknowledged during an interview that lack of communication in a resident's preferred language could lead to frustration and that an appropriate intervention would be to obtain another staff member to interpret. The facility's policy on accommodating communication deficits stated that communication needs would be identified and appropriate interventions, including care planning, would be developed to meet those needs. However, the facility did not implement these interventions for the two residents, resulting in their communication needs not being met.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙