Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Elopement of High-Risk Resident

Riverton, Wyoming Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of 2 out of 15 and a diagnosis of moderate dementia with behavioral disturbances, was admitted to the facility. The initial elopement risk evaluation did not identify the resident as an elopement risk, but subsequent assessments and care plan updates noted a history of attempts to leave the facility unattended, impaired safety awareness, and verbalized intent to go home. Despite these risk factors, the resident was able to leave the facility without staff knowledge on two separate occasions. On one occasion, the resident was noticed missing after having spent most of the day outside. Staff initiated a search, contacted local law enforcement, and found the resident returning to the facility after having walked to a store. On another occasion, the resident was again found missing, and staff discovered the resident's wanderguard device on the floor of the resident's room. After a search and notification of police, the resident was located walking on a main street and brought back to the facility. The resident refused a full body skin assessment upon return. Observations during the survey confirmed that the resident continued to spend time outside, often accompanied by 1:1 staff supervision. Interviews with the resident and the resident's representative confirmed the resident's preference for being outdoors and the facility's ongoing efforts to monitor and supervise the resident. The facility's failure to prevent the resident from leaving the premises without staff knowledge, despite known risk factors and previous incidents, constituted a deficiency in providing adequate supervision and ensuring the environment was free from accident hazards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙