Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Update and Reconcile Advance Directives in Medical Record

Madison, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's advance directives were accurate and up to date in the electronic medical record. Specifically, one resident's CPR preference form indicated a desire for full code status (to receive CPR), while the electronic medical record and physician orders reflected a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) status. This discrepancy was identified during a review of the resident's records and confirmed through interviews with nursing staff, who acknowledged that the resident's code status should be consistent across all documentation. The facility's policy requires that information about advance directives be prominently displayed and updated in the medical record, and that changes be communicated to the interdisciplinary team and reflected in the care plan. Despite this, the resident's updated CPR preference was not entered into the electronic medical record, resulting in conflicting documentation. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the need for consistency between the resident's expressed wishes and the medical record, but the necessary updates were not made at the time the new preference was obtained.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙