Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0551
D

Failure to Obtain Required Protective Placement Documentation for Resident with Guardian

Sheboygan, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a legal Guardian had the required court-ordered protective placement documentation, as mandated by State Statute Chapter 55.03(4) for residents whose nursing home stay exceeds 90 days. The resident, who had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, restlessness and agitation, anxiety, and mood disorder, was admitted with Michigan Guardian paperwork for healthcare decisions. Despite the resident's intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, the medical record did not contain evidence of the necessary protective placement documentation. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that the Social Services Director notified the Aging and Disability Resource Center Staff (ADRCS) about the need for protective placement and provided communication records. ADRCS requested specific guardianship documents from the facility, but these were not provided. Further, ADRCS identified that the protective placement paperwork should be filed in the county where the resident previously resided, and attempts to obtain the necessary documents from that county were made. However, the required protective placement documentation was not present in the resident's record at the time of the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙