Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0698
D

Failure to Ensure Ongoing Dialysis Communication and Fistula Monitoring

Green Bay, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 05-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center and did not consistently monitor the fistula site for a resident who required hemodialysis. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, received dialysis three times weekly. Facility policy required daily monitoring of the fistula or graft for pulse, buzzing, or thrill, and regular checks for patency. However, the resident's care plan and Medication Administration Record did not reflect daily monitoring for bruit/thrill, and only eight dialysis communication entries were documented over an eight-month period. Staff interviews confirmed that monitoring for bruit/thrill was not included in the resident's MAR or TAR, and there was confusion among staff regarding what information was sent to and received from the dialysis center. The Director of Nursing and other staff indicated that the facility's policy and physician's orders should be followed, but the required aftercare instructions and consistent communication with the dialysis center were lacking. The dialysis center also reported not receiving the expected documentation from the facility, and there was no communication binder in place for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙