Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0726
D

Lack of Staff Competency and Training for VP Shunt Care

River Falls, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 06-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Licensed nurses at the facility did not have the specific competencies and skill set necessary to care for a resident with a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, as identified through the resident's assessment and care plan. The facility's own assessment and training documentation indicated that staff competencies should be based on the clinical characteristics of the resident population, with a curriculum and training plan developed accordingly. However, review of facility education and training materials showed that VP shunt care was not included as a topic for training or competency evaluation. The resident in question had a history of congenital hydrocephalus and a cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, with severe cognitive impairment noted on the most recent assessment. The care plan required nursing staff to pump the VP shunt as directed by the neurosurgeon, but did not include assessment for signs or symptoms of infection or fluid overload related to the shunt. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that training on VP shunt care was informal and limited to being shown how to palpate and pump the shunt, with no formal education on the amount of pressure, rate, or depth of compression, nor on potential complications or necessary assessments beyond monitoring neurological status. Staff were unable to articulate additional assessments or complications related to VP shunt malfunction. The Director of Nursing was unable to provide documentation of training or competency evaluation for VP shunt care and confirmed that no current training was in place for this procedure.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙