Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Monitor and Assess VP Shunt According to Standards

River Falls, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 06-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The resident, who had congenital hydrocephalus and a cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, was severely cognitively impaired and required regular monitoring of the VP shunt for complications such as infection or malfunction. The care plan directed nursing staff to pump the shunt as per neurosurgeon instructions but did not include interventions for assessment of the shunt line for infection or abdominal assessment for signs of fluid overload related to cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Review of the resident's records showed that while the shunt was pumped as ordered, there was no documentation of the number of pumps performed, nor were there any documented assessments of the abdomen or the shunt for signs of infection or other complications. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that their training was limited to the mechanical aspect of pumping the shunt, with no education or documentation regarding assessment for potential complications. The Director of Nursing was unable to provide evidence of staff training or assessment protocols related to the VP shunt, and no additional physician orders for assessment were present.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙