Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility and Hearing Aid Provision

Clintonville, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 07-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, as well as other medical conditions such as anxiety, chronic pain, asthma, and neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, was found to have deficiencies in care related to the accommodation of their needs and preferences. The resident's care plan identified a risk for falls due to left-sided weakness and included interventions to ensure the call light was within reach. However, on multiple occasions, the call light was observed to be placed on the resident's left side, which was affected by paralysis, making it inaccessible. The resident reported that staff sometimes intentionally placed the call light out of reach, requiring the use of a reacher to access needed items. Staff confirmed the call light was not within reach and only corrected its placement after being notified by the surveyor. Additionally, the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the use of hearing aids, but the care plan did not address hearing or hearing aids. The resident was observed without hearing aids and stated that staff did not assist with putting them in, requiring the resident to request this assistance. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of a care plan for hearing aids and acknowledged that the call light should have been within reach due to the resident's limited mobility. The facility did not have a specific call light policy, relying instead on the standard of care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙