Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0551
D

Failure to Ensure Healthcare Decisions Made by Legally Authorized Representative

Green Bay, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the right to make healthcare decisions for a resident was extended only to those legally authorized, as required by state law. A resident with severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of 6 out of 15, was admitted with a court-ordered temporary guardianship that expired after a set period. Despite the expiration of the temporary guardianship and the absence of documentation for permanent guardianship, the facility continued to allow the former temporary guardian to make healthcare decisions for the resident. Medical records and social services notes confirmed that the temporary guardian was involved in signing admission agreements, vaccine consents, and making referral requests after the guardianship had lapsed. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that the facility was aware the temporary guardianship had expired and that the resident was legally their own decision maker at that time. However, the facility did not obtain updated guardianship paperwork or ensure that only a legally authorized representative made healthcare decisions for the resident. The social services director acknowledged that the former temporary guardian continued to act as the resident's legal representative and decision maker after the expiration of the guardianship, contrary to legal requirements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙