Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0607
E

Failure to Complete Required Background Check for Contracted Hairstylist

Green Bay, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation by not ensuring a thorough caregiver background check was completed for a contracted hairstylist. According to the facility's policy, all potential employees, contracted staff, volunteers, and consultants must undergo background, reference, and credentials checks, with documentation maintained as proof. However, when the surveyor requested background check information for a sample of staff, it was found that the hairstylist's background check was not completed prior to providing services, and the hire date was not documented. The only available documentation was a Background Information Disclosure form dated after the surveyor's request, with no evidence of a state background check conducted beforehand. Interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the hairstylist was not considered an employee, and therefore, a background check was not initially completed, despite the individual being paid by the facility and providing services to residents since the previous year. The NHA acknowledged that, per facility policy, a background check should have been completed before the hairstylist began working with residents. The hairstylist also confirmed providing monthly services to residents and being compensated by the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙