Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Provide Individualized Continence and Incontinence Care

Port Edwards, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 08-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services related to bowel and bladder continence for two residents. One resident, who had an indwelling catheter and was continent of bowel, was observed wearing an incontinence product despite no such need being documented in the care plan or requested by the resident. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was able to communicate bowel needs and did not require or request the use of an incontinence product. The care plan and status sheet did not indicate the use of such products, and the resident was unaware of the reason for being provided with a brief. Another resident, who was frequently incontinent of urine but always continent of bowel, was observed being provided with two incontinence products at once, a practice not reflected in the care plan or requested by the resident. Staff indicated that double incontinence products were used due to heavy urination, but this was not documented or approved by the resident or their representative. The DON and RN responsible for care plans confirmed that such use should be documented and only done upon request or instruction, which was not the case for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙