Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Investigate and Address Alleged Delay in Incontinence Care

Follansbee, West Virginia Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

Fine: $65,27447 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and did not take necessary steps to address an alleged violation regarding a resident's care. A resident, who was classified as dependent and had decision-making capacity, reported waiting three hours for incontinence care. The facility's investigation concluded the allegation was unsubstantiated. However, documentation included a corroborating statement from the resident's roommate, who also had capacity, confirming that the resident experienced extended wait times for assistance on multiple occasions, including the night in question. Additionally, a physical therapist documented that the resident reported repeated requests for assistance over the weekend that were not fulfilled by nursing assistants. Review of toileting logs showed significant gaps between care episodes, with the resident receiving assistance at widely spaced intervals, supporting the claim of delayed care. The roommate further stated that the resident was often ignored and eventually moved to another facility by her family. These findings indicate that the facility did not adequately respond to or investigate the alleged violation, as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙