Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences and Provide Meal Alternatives

Follansbee, West Virginia Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

Fine: $65,27447 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors observed that the facility failed to honor resident food preferences and provide appropriate meal alternatives for two residents. One resident, who had a documented dislike of peas, was served a meal that included peas, and although the nurse aide acknowledged the resident's preference, no alternative vegetable was offered. The resident's meal ticket did not list peas, but the meal served included them, and the resident's care plan specifically stated that food preferences should be honored and alternate choices provided as needed. Another resident, identified as being at nutritional risk with a history of weight loss and on a therapeutic diet, was served tuna sandwiches despite having fish listed as a dislike. When the resident declined the meal, a staff member offered only grilled cheese and fruit, not the alternate meal of Salisbury steak that was available. The staff later confirmed that the alternate meal was not offered and was no longer available after a certain time. The dietary manager confirmed that the resident's dislikes were accurately documented and that the resident should have received the alternate meal if it had been ordered in time.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙