Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Inform Resident and Support Autonomy in Care Decisions

Follansbee, West Virginia Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

Fine: $65,27447 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to notify a resident of treatment and healthcare information in accordance with his preferences, and did not ensure the resident had the opportunity to exercise autonomy regarding important aspects of his life. The resident, an older veteran, reported feeling unsafe due to not being kept informed about his lab test results and other treatment outcomes. He also stated that he was not invited to participate in his care plan meetings and that his requests for documentation from the facility were ignored, despite receiving such information from the VA hospital. A review of the resident's care plan showed that it included goals for involving the resident in care planning, promoting participation in care decisions, and informing him of changes in status or care needs. However, interviews with facility staff revealed that there was no consistent process for sending or documenting invitations to care plan meetings, and no evidence was provided to show that the resident had been invited. Additionally, the DON was unaware of the resident's desire to receive copies of his lab results, indicating a lack of communication and follow-through on the resident's expressed preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙