Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Allegation of Resident Neglect

Beckley, West Virginia Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect involving a resident who was reported by his sister to have left for a medical appointment in an unclean state, with unchanged socks and inadequate hygiene. Although the facility promptly reported the incident and collected statements from staff and the resident, they did not verify the allegation beyond these internal accounts. The investigation did not include contacting the ambulance company that transported the resident or the healthcare facility where the appointment took place, despite the sister's previous complaints and the external facility's subsequent report to the survey agency. Upon review, it was found that when the resident arrived at the outside healthcare facility, staff there observed that he smelled strongly of urine, and his socks and clothing were soiled and adhered to his feet. The facility's social workers and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that they had not reached out to the ambulance company or obtained the external facility's consult until prompted by the surveyor. The resident was known to have frequent incontinence and refused to wear briefs, a fact acknowledged by both staff and his sister, but this information was not adequately incorporated into the investigation process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙