Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
E

Failure to Provide Palatable, Appealing, and Properly Served Meals

Salem, West Virginia Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that food and drink were palatable, visually appealing, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature, as evidenced by observations, staff and resident interviews, and record reviews. Multiple residents reported that meals were bland, cold, and not served according to their individual preferences. Food was described as lacking seasoning, being overcooked or undercooked, and visually unappealing, with no garnishes or condiments provided. The care plans reviewed did not document residents' dietary preferences, dislikes, or specific modifications, and there were no interventions listed to support resident satisfaction with meals. The dietary manager acknowledged that resident food preferences were not routinely gathered, except during infrequent walk-throughs and committee meetings, and relied on CNAs to relay concerns. Environmental observations in the kitchen revealed poor sanitation, broken equipment, inadequate refrigeration, and lack of ventilation or air conditioning, further compromising food quality and safety. Despite resident complaints about food quality, the facility failed to provide requested test trays for surveyors to assess food temperature, appearance, and taste. The dietary manager admitted to not following up on the delivery of test trays, and the survey team was not notified when trays were placed on the meal cart, resulting in the trays not being received. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, and the facility administrator acknowledged the breakdown in communication. These failures were observed for all five residents reviewed for food satisfaction, with a facility census of 87.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙