Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Accurately Communicate Resident Skin Condition During Transfer

Hilltop, West Virginia Survey Completed on 05-13-2025

Penalty

Fine: $22,562
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide accurate and complete information regarding a resident's skin condition during a transfer to another nursing home. Documentation at the time of discharge indicated that a skin check was completed and no new issues were identified, and the discharge paperwork reviewed with the MPOA and receiving nurse did not mention any significant wounds. However, a skin and wound assessment from the same period documented deep tissue injuries to both heels and a surgical wound to the abdomen. Additionally, the pre-admission screening and MDS assessments did not indicate the presence of pressure ulcers. Interviews with staff at the receiving facility revealed that the resident arrived with a dressing on the coccyx, which appeared to cover a severe wound described as deep, malodorous, and possibly to the bone. The body audit conducted at admission to the receiving facility also noted a wound on the coccyx covered with a dressing and redness on both heels. When confronted with this information, the facility's administrator, wound nurse, and DON acknowledged the presence of the dressing but could not explain its origin and denied knowledge of a Stage III pressure ulcer on the coccyx.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙