Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Multiple Residents

Seattle, Washington Survey Completed on 05-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for four out of thirteen residents reviewed. For one resident, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that an opioid was administered during the MDS look-back period, but this was not documented in Section N of the MDS. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the opioid use should have been marked, indicating inaccurate MDS coding. Another resident's quarterly MDS indicated the presence of delusion in Section E, but there was no supporting documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for this behavior during the observation period. The MDS Coordinator was unable to find any evidence to support the coding of delusion and confirmed it should not have been coded. The Director of Nursing stated that MDS assessments are expected to be coded accurately. For a third resident, the MDS indicated that the resident was rarely or never understood and did not complete the activity preferences interview with the resident's family or significant other, as required when the resident cannot communicate. The MDS Coordinator admitted that no attempt was made to contact the family or significant other. In the fourth case, the MDS showed that a resident received an insulin injection during the observation period, but there was no physician's order for insulin, and the MDS Coordinator confirmed that insulin should not have been coded. The Director of Nursing reiterated the expectation for accurate MDS completion.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙