Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0727
F

DNS Served as Charge Nurse Despite High Census

Spokane, Washington Survey Completed on 07-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) did not serve as a charge nurse when the average daily occupancy exceeded 60 residents. Record review showed the facility's average daily census ranged from 75 to 85 residents, and the staffing plan required a full-time DNS to meet resident care needs. Despite this, interviews with the administrator, resident care manager, staffing coordinator, and DNS confirmed that the DNS and other nurse managers rotated on-call duties during weekends and were required to work as charge nurses if staffing coverage could not be found. The DNS acknowledged working the floor as a charge nurse under these circumstances, even though the facility census was consistently above the threshold where this practice is not permitted. The facility's contingency staffing plan allowed for interdepartmental staff support to address staffing shortages, provided licensure and certification requirements were not violated. However, the DNS and other nurse managers regularly filled in as charge nurses during staffing shortages, contrary to regulatory requirements for facilities with an average daily census over 60. This practice was confirmed through multiple staff interviews and review of facility records, which documented the ongoing use of the DNS in a charge nurse role despite the facility's census and established staffing policies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙