Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
E

Failure to Maintain Guardianship Documentation and Offer Advance Directives

Seattle, Washington Survey Completed on 06-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to obtain and/or renew guardianship papers and did not offer or document assistance in formulating advance directives for three of four residents reviewed. For one resident with a diagnosis of unspecified intellectual disabilities, guardianship papers were found to be expired, and there was no clear assignment of responsibility among staff for ensuring these documents were current and available in the electronic health record (EHR). Interviews with staff revealed confusion about who was responsible for maintaining up-to-date guardianship documentation, and the administrator was unaware of the process. Another resident with intact cognition had no documentation in their EHR regarding advance directives, nor was there evidence that the topic was discussed or that assistance was offered. Staff confirmed that there was no record of such a discussion, despite facility policy requiring that residents be offered information and assistance with advance directives upon admission. A third resident, who was their own decision-maker, expressed interest in designating a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) for health care but reported that the facility did not request a copy of an advance directive or offer the option to establish one. The social worker acknowledged that a conversation with the resident’s contact about DPOA was not documented. The administrator confirmed that residents should be given the opportunity to delegate DPOA and that these directives should be documented and accessible, but this was not done for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙