Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Failure to Administer and Document Tube Feeding per Provider Orders

Spokane, Washington Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident who was dependent on tube feeding received nutrition according to provider orders. The resident, admitted with a progressive neurological condition and severe malnutrition, was assessed as cognitively intact and required enteral nutrition. Observations confirmed the presence of tube feeding equipment in use. However, review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) for both May and June revealed inconsistent and incomplete documentation of the actual amounts of nutrition administered per shift. Nurses often recorded only the hourly rate or a single value, rather than the total amount delivered per shift as ordered. Further review showed that on several occasions, the amount of enteral nutrition administered exceeded the physician's prescribed rate, with overages documented on multiple shifts. The registered dietitian acknowledged that the medical record did not consistently show that the prescribed rate was provided and noted miscommunication regarding MAR documentation requirements. These findings were based on observation, interview, and record review, and were shared with facility staff during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙