Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Provide Timely Vision Services

Monroe, Washington Survey Completed on 05-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide proper treatment to maintain vision for a resident with a history of cataracts and diabetes mellitus type 2. The resident, who was cognitively intact and wore glasses, expressed a desire to have their eyes checked and reported difficulty reading the television even with their eyeglasses. The last documented optometry visit for the resident was in 2021, despite a recommendation for a follow-up in one year. There was no evidence in the medical record of any subsequent optometry visits or updated assessments, and the resident could not recall the last time they had an eye exam. Staff interviews revealed that the process for scheduling optometry visits relied on resident or family requests, care conference discussions, or staff observations. However, the optometrist only visited when there were at least six residents on the list, and the resident in question had not been added to the list despite reporting vision issues. Nursing and care staff were unaware of the resident's complaints, and documentation from a recent care conference left the section on visual appliances blank, with 'not applicable' checked. This lack of follow-up and communication resulted in the resident not receiving timely vision care as recommended.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙